I wanted to share with you an inspiring Christian novella written by Raquel at God's Daughter. The story is called Life's Choices and deals with some of the most pressing issues to today's young Christian.
My fifteen year old sister read it in one day and was inspired to more diligently work at her writing studies. It filled me with joy to see a young blogger who was called to write something moral, inspirational, and to share it with the world.
Chapter One
Chapter Two
Chapter Three
Chapter Four
Chapter Five
Chapter Six
Chapter Seven
Thank you Raquel for allowing me to post this - and for fans of the story, you'll have to email Miss Raquel for the conclusion!
Tuesday, July 20, 2010
Monday, July 5, 2010
My Favourite Cooking Blogs
A woman's chief pride is as the keeper of her home. This means cooking, cleaning, managing any bills she is given responsibility for, and keeping the children happy and well taught.
Cooking is one of the easiest, most essential skills a young lady should learn, and yet, we live in a culture where frozen pizza and condensed soup are ubiquitous.
I've taught myself to cook through several cooking blogs, and through watching The Food Network/Viva Channel. Many of these blogs have a secular focus, but all of them share a love of wholesome food made with love - something any father, brother or husband can appreciate!
Pioneer Woman - The original 'cowgirl' blog, with a stay at home momma who homeschools, helps her hubby's business, and cooks with lots of cream and butter! Try the Springy Shells!
The Smitten Kitchen - A bit more 'urbane' than I can usually manage, but the recipes are delicious and I like that she's honest and shows us the failures, too. Try the zucchini latkes!
Orangette - It's more 'informative about food' rather than in depth recipes, and very secular, but the articles are super informative. I like the fingerling potatoes recipe from August '08.
I also used to like Mark Bittman's blog "bitten" for the NY Times, but it's now been rolled into an enormous polyblog of several subjects, most of which seems to involve urbane and outlandish alcohol mixtures, so I can't recommend it.
However, if you see his books on sale, pick them up. They're reference books more than cookbooks, and will teach your younger sisters or daughters the basics of cooking everything from snapper to salsify!
Cooking is one of the easiest, most essential skills a young lady should learn, and yet, we live in a culture where frozen pizza and condensed soup are ubiquitous.
I've taught myself to cook through several cooking blogs, and through watching The Food Network/Viva Channel. Many of these blogs have a secular focus, but all of them share a love of wholesome food made with love - something any father, brother or husband can appreciate!
Pioneer Woman - The original 'cowgirl' blog, with a stay at home momma who homeschools, helps her hubby's business, and cooks with lots of cream and butter! Try the Springy Shells!
The Smitten Kitchen - A bit more 'urbane' than I can usually manage, but the recipes are delicious and I like that she's honest and shows us the failures, too. Try the zucchini latkes!
Orangette - It's more 'informative about food' rather than in depth recipes, and very secular, but the articles are super informative. I like the fingerling potatoes recipe from August '08.
I also used to like Mark Bittman's blog "bitten" for the NY Times, but it's now been rolled into an enormous polyblog of several subjects, most of which seems to involve urbane and outlandish alcohol mixtures, so I can't recommend it.
However, if you see his books on sale, pick them up. They're reference books more than cookbooks, and will teach your younger sisters or daughters the basics of cooking everything from snapper to salsify!
Friday, July 2, 2010
UnTraditional Families - MSM says it's better than Mom, Dad and Kids
Warning - adult content, inappropriate for children under 18
This post will discuss an article I recently read on lesbian women who have children. That said, use your judgment in reading my post.
My cousin, who is quite liberal, sent me a link to this article from Time:
Kids with Lesbian Parents May Do Better Than Their Peers
I took a double take - what? Is there some scientific proof now that lesbians raise children better than the Biblically-advocated family, the family that's worked for millennia?
The answer is - of course not. On some psychological measures, children of lesbian parents scored better on 'self esteem' scores when contrasted against children of 'heterosexual parents.' Now, ignoring the difficulties I have with the cult of self esteem and modern psychology in general, let's look closer at the research.
This study was incredibly flawed, but Time flouted it as if it proved that the conservative agenda produced dysfunctional families and misery.
So, what was wrong with the study?
The authors didn't control for major demographic factors, for instance, race. Black and Hispanic Americans were included in the heterosexual families. But they were underrepresented in the gay families. Racism hurts children's self esteem.
The total gay-raised childrens' sample size was 78 children. Why so small? Currently, there are 270313 children raised in America by homosexual parents.
Lesbian parents also have the money and planning capability to become pregnant without a husband. They thought carefully before having children.
The study also noted that the gay parents "communicated frequently" with their children, as opposed to heterosexual parents.
So why not compare apples to apples? If I were to redo this study, I'd make the heterosexual group:
- 78 children being raised by traditional two-parent families.
- I'd make all 78 children have the same race as the gay parent families.
- I'd select parents who talk frequently with their daughters and sons.
- I'd choose parents who wanted their children, parents who believe that children are a blessing, and that it is their parental duty to raise them up in an appropriate, loving way.
Now this is not meant to single out the children of homosexual parents, or even the parents themselves (even if I disagree strongly with their choices). This is about scientific propaganda and a subtle media attack on Christian values.
This article takes the fundamental building block of society, the nuclear family, and presents it as unnecessary - in fact, an imperfect model of family. A second best. The authors cloak their findings in scientific wording, and send news releases to magazines so that the flaws in the study are more difficult for the average Jane or Joe to find.
It's articles like this that remind me to be ever vigilant, ever critical, and to always turn your mind to - what's wrong with this picture? Because if something is antithetical to the Bible - it's generally antithetical to logic and common sense, too.
This post will discuss an article I recently read on lesbian women who have children. That said, use your judgment in reading my post.
My cousin, who is quite liberal, sent me a link to this article from Time:
Kids with Lesbian Parents May Do Better Than Their Peers
I took a double take - what? Is there some scientific proof now that lesbians raise children better than the Biblically-advocated family, the family that's worked for millennia?
The answer is - of course not. On some psychological measures, children of lesbian parents scored better on 'self esteem' scores when contrasted against children of 'heterosexual parents.' Now, ignoring the difficulties I have with the cult of self esteem and modern psychology in general, let's look closer at the research.
This study was incredibly flawed, but Time flouted it as if it proved that the conservative agenda produced dysfunctional families and misery.
So, what was wrong with the study?
The authors didn't control for major demographic factors, for instance, race. Black and Hispanic Americans were included in the heterosexual families. But they were underrepresented in the gay families. Racism hurts children's self esteem.
The total gay-raised childrens' sample size was 78 children. Why so small? Currently, there are 270313 children raised in America by homosexual parents.
Lesbian parents also have the money and planning capability to become pregnant without a husband. They thought carefully before having children.
The study also noted that the gay parents "communicated frequently" with their children, as opposed to heterosexual parents.
So why not compare apples to apples? If I were to redo this study, I'd make the heterosexual group:
- 78 children being raised by traditional two-parent families.
- I'd make all 78 children have the same race as the gay parent families.
- I'd select parents who talk frequently with their daughters and sons.
- I'd choose parents who wanted their children, parents who believe that children are a blessing, and that it is their parental duty to raise them up in an appropriate, loving way.
Now this is not meant to single out the children of homosexual parents, or even the parents themselves (even if I disagree strongly with their choices). This is about scientific propaganda and a subtle media attack on Christian values.
This article takes the fundamental building block of society, the nuclear family, and presents it as unnecessary - in fact, an imperfect model of family. A second best. The authors cloak their findings in scientific wording, and send news releases to magazines so that the flaws in the study are more difficult for the average Jane or Joe to find.
It's articles like this that remind me to be ever vigilant, ever critical, and to always turn your mind to - what's wrong with this picture? Because if something is antithetical to the Bible - it's generally antithetical to logic and common sense, too.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)